WIKIPEDIA / ELECTRONIC HARASSMENT / DIRECT ENERGY WEAPONS
There is compelling evidence that classified "Directed Energy Weapons Technology", "Microwave Lasers", "Sonic Weapons", "Infrasound" and "Sonic Weaponry Technology" developed by the U.S. Government is in the hands of hate groups and organized crime. These covert weapons are said to be used secretly and silently to harass loyal Americans, strangle their businesses ,and gain control of their assets.
Targeted Individuals (or TIs as they call themselves) warn that so long as these weapons technologies remain classified, responsible government and law enforcement agencies cannot protect them and other Americans, families and businesses from these threats.
How Could This Happen ?
The U.S. Government does not build bombers or battleships. It contracts with outside private companies to procure Military / Military Procurement Products and Programs. Most military research and development remains classified unless there are compelling reasons to make it public.
Some of this electronic harassment technology is said to have leaked from these private defense contractors into the hands of organized crime and hate groups. To date, the U.S. Government has been reluctant to admit publicly that the threat exists or that they have lost control of the technology.
Why Is It So Hard To Detect ?
Most bio-affective sonic and electro magnetic frequencies lie in the extremely low frequency range of 5 to 200 cycles per second which mimic and parallel the electronic functioning of the human nervous system.
Since there are relatively few legitimate commercial uses for these extremely low frequency transmissions, test equipment to detect and prove their use is not currently available for a reasonable price.
What Are The Effects Of These Directed Energy Weapons ?
It is well known and well documented that microwave and extremely low frequency Extremely low frequency sonic and electromagnetic frequencies can disorient and disrupt human functioning, cause memory loss and confusion. Some frequencies are said to induce cancer, heart attack or stroke. Recent publicity about "Active Denial Technologies " indicate they cause pain, serious injury and even death.
If the charges are correct and this classified, covert technology is in the hands of organized crime and hate groups, the implications and impact on our freedom and future is frightening.
See :
http://www.ElectronicElephants.com
for further details and lists of reputable resources and links describing the electronic weaponry threat.
Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_harassment
Gerry Duffett
Pager # 416-612-5689
http://www.goliathboards.com/users5/gerryduffett/index.cgi
There is compelling evidence that classified "Directed Energy Weapons Technology", "Microwave Lasers", "Sonic Weapons", "Infrasound" and "Sonic Weaponry Technology" developed by the U.S. Government is in the hands of hate groups and organized crime. These covert weapons are said to be used secretly and silently to harass loyal Americans, strangle their businesses ,and gain control of their assets.
Targeted Individuals (or TIs as they call themselves) warn that so long as these weapons technologies remain classified, responsible government and law enforcement agencies cannot protect them and other Americans, families and businesses from these threats.
How Could This Happen ?
The U.S. Government does not build bombers or battleships. It contracts with outside private companies to procure Military / Military Procurement Products and Programs. Most military research and development remains classified unless there are compelling reasons to make it public.
Some of this electronic harassment technology is said to have leaked from these private defense contractors into the hands of organized crime and hate groups. To date, the U.S. Government has been reluctant to admit publicly that the threat exists or that they have lost control of the technology.
Why Is It So Hard To Detect ?
Most bio-affective sonic and electro magnetic frequencies lie in the extremely low frequency range of 5 to 200 cycles per second which mimic and parallel the electronic functioning of the human nervous system.
Since there are relatively few legitimate commercial uses for these extremely low frequency transmissions, test equipment to detect and prove their use is not currently available for a reasonable price.
What Are The Effects Of These Directed Energy Weapons ?
It is well known and well documented that microwave and extremely low frequency Extremely low frequency sonic and electromagnetic frequencies can disorient and disrupt human functioning, cause memory loss and confusion. Some frequencies are said to induce cancer, heart attack or stroke. Recent publicity about "Active Denial Technologies " indicate they cause pain, serious injury and even death.
If the charges are correct and this classified, covert technology is in the hands of organized crime and hate groups, the implications and impact on our freedom and future is frightening.
See :
http://www.ElectronicElephants.com
for further details and lists of reputable resources and links describing the electronic weaponry threat.
Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_harassment
Gerry Duffett
Pager # 416-612-5689
http://www.goliathboards.com/users5/gerryduffett/index.cgi
gerryduffett
November 6th, 2007, 08:34 AM
Remote Neural Monitoring
From Wikipedia,
the Free Encyclopedia
Located here :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Neural_Monitoring
Remote Neural Monitoring
is a form of functional neuroimaging,
claimed to have been developed by the
National Security Agency
"NSA",
that is capable of extracting EEG data from the human brain at a distance with no contacts or electrodes required.
It is further claimed that the NSA has the capablility to decode this data to extract
subvocalizations, visual and auditory data.
In effect it allows access to a person's thoughts
without their "knowledge" or "permission".
It has been alleged that various organizations have been using
"Remote Neural Monitoring"
on US and other citizens for surveillance and harassment purposes.
Contents
1 History
2 Peaceful applications
3 See also
4 References
5 External links
History
Remote Neural Monitoring
has its roots in the infamous MKULTRA project of the 1950s which,
although it focussed on drugs for mind control,
also included neurological research into
"radiation"
"non-ionizing EMF" ................and
bioelectric research and development.
The earliest non-classified references to this type of technology appear in a 1976 patent by
R.G. Malech Patent #3951134
"Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves"
USPTO granted 4/20/76.
The patent describes a technique using the transmission of 100 and 210 MHz signals to the brain yielding a 110 MHz signal which is modulated by the brain waves and can be detected by a receiver for further processing.
In the early 1980s it is claimed that the NSA began extensive use of
Remote Neural Monitoring.
Much of what is known about it stems from evidence presented as part of a 1992 court case brought by former NSA employee
John St.Claire Akwei
against the NSA.
It describes an extensive array of advanced technology and resources dedicated to remotely monitoring hundreds of thousands of people in the US and abroad.
Capabilities include access to an individual's subvocalizations as well as images from the visual cortex and sounds from the auditory cortex.
Peaceful Applications
While use of this technology by organizations like the NSA is difficult to validate,
recent advances in non-classified areas are already demonstrating what is possible:
Subvocal recognition using attached electrodes has already been achieved by NASA.
BCIs for gaming consoles from companies like
NeuroSky
perform primitive "thought reading" in that they can be controlled with a helmet on the player's head,
where the player can execute a few commands just by thinking about them.
Ambient has demonstrated a motorized wheelchair that is controlled by thought.
See also
NSA warrantless surveillance controversy
NSA electronic surveillance program
subvocal recognition
neuroethics
References
Lawsuit - John St. Clair Akwei vs. NSA, Ft. Meade, MD, USA.
Hamilton, Joan. If They Could Read Your Mind. Stanford Magazine.
Butler, Declan (1998-01-22). "Advances in neuroscience may threaten human rights". Nature 391 (6665): 316.
Bluck, John. NASA DEVELOPS SYSTEM TO COMPUTERIZE SILENT, 'SUBVOCAL SPEECH'.
Simonite, Tom. "Thinking of words can guide your wheelchair". New Scientist.
External links
NASA Ames Center.
Ambient Corporation.
NeuroSky.
Freedom from Covert Surveillance and Harassment.
Mind Justice.
Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Neural_Monitoring
Categories:
Neuroscience | Neuroimaging | Ethics of science and technology | National Security Agency | Mind control
From Wikipedia,
the Free Encyclopedia
Located here :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Neural_Monitoring
Remote Neural Monitoring
is a form of functional neuroimaging,
claimed to have been developed by the
National Security Agency
"NSA",
that is capable of extracting EEG data from the human brain at a distance with no contacts or electrodes required.
It is further claimed that the NSA has the capablility to decode this data to extract
subvocalizations, visual and auditory data.
In effect it allows access to a person's thoughts
without their "knowledge" or "permission".
It has been alleged that various organizations have been using
"Remote Neural Monitoring"
on US and other citizens for surveillance and harassment purposes.
Contents
1 History
2 Peaceful applications
3 See also
4 References
5 External links
History
Remote Neural Monitoring
has its roots in the infamous MKULTRA project of the 1950s which,
although it focussed on drugs for mind control,
also included neurological research into
"radiation"
"non-ionizing EMF" ................and
bioelectric research and development.
The earliest non-classified references to this type of technology appear in a 1976 patent by
R.G. Malech Patent #3951134
"Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves"
USPTO granted 4/20/76.
The patent describes a technique using the transmission of 100 and 210 MHz signals to the brain yielding a 110 MHz signal which is modulated by the brain waves and can be detected by a receiver for further processing.
In the early 1980s it is claimed that the NSA began extensive use of
Remote Neural Monitoring.
Much of what is known about it stems from evidence presented as part of a 1992 court case brought by former NSA employee
John St.Claire Akwei
against the NSA.
It describes an extensive array of advanced technology and resources dedicated to remotely monitoring hundreds of thousands of people in the US and abroad.
Capabilities include access to an individual's subvocalizations as well as images from the visual cortex and sounds from the auditory cortex.
Peaceful Applications
While use of this technology by organizations like the NSA is difficult to validate,
recent advances in non-classified areas are already demonstrating what is possible:
Subvocal recognition using attached electrodes has already been achieved by NASA.
BCIs for gaming consoles from companies like
NeuroSky
perform primitive "thought reading" in that they can be controlled with a helmet on the player's head,
where the player can execute a few commands just by thinking about them.
Ambient has demonstrated a motorized wheelchair that is controlled by thought.
See also
NSA warrantless surveillance controversy
NSA electronic surveillance program
subvocal recognition
neuroethics
References
Lawsuit - John St. Clair Akwei vs. NSA, Ft. Meade, MD, USA.
Hamilton, Joan. If They Could Read Your Mind. Stanford Magazine.
Butler, Declan (1998-01-22). "Advances in neuroscience may threaten human rights". Nature 391 (6665): 316.
Bluck, John. NASA DEVELOPS SYSTEM TO COMPUTERIZE SILENT, 'SUBVOCAL SPEECH'.
Simonite, Tom. "Thinking of words can guide your wheelchair". New Scientist.
External links
NASA Ames Center.
Ambient Corporation.
NeuroSky.
Freedom from Covert Surveillance and Harassment.
Mind Justice.
Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Neural_Monitoring
Categories:
Neuroscience | Neuroimaging | Ethics of science and technology | National Security Agency | Mind control
No comments:
Post a Comment